Top Ten Documents Every Reporter Covering Exxon-Mobil Should Know


If you are a reporter covering ExxonMobil and the unfolding #ExxonKnew investigations underway in several states, the story can get very complex.  Exxon is claiming it did nothing wrong.  Exxon's paid accomplices are martyring themselves and screaming about the First Amendment.

We thought we would take it back to basics - the source documents. We created an online file cabinet of the key documents that have been revealed by investigative journalists over the past nine months and those in our Exxon archives from 25 years of watching the climate denial machine at work.  We will add documents as they arrive on our desks.

These documents all live at, an archive built on the Document Cloud platform familiar to journalists, created with a grant by the Knight Foundation.

There are three basic phases to this story. 

What Exxon knew and when they knew it - The crux of what was revealed in the fall and winter of 2015 by the Inside Climate News investigation and the Columbia University/ Los Angeles Times collaboration is extensive new evidence that Exxon and the rest of the oil industry had a more thorough understanding of climate science in the 1970s and 1980s than had previously been realized.  And that they also understood the policy and economic implications of the climate threat. Further revelations by DeSmog in April 2016 confirmed Exxon's unequivocal knowledge in the late 1970s that "there is no doubt that increases in fossil fuel usage" were problematic for climate, and that these facts were known across Exxon's global operations. This serves as a new backdrop for what happened next.

What Exxon did to block rising concern about climate change - This phase starts in the late 1980s, heats up in the mid 1990s and extends into the late 2000s, changing shape and tone with increased governmental attention to the climate threat. Here there are key documents showing Exxon's (and Mobil's and later ExxonMobil's) ringleader role in driving the corporate campaign against advancing national and international policies to avert dangerous climate change.

What Exxon would like hide from investigators now - Exxon executed a turn about a decade ago with clever PR tactics, declaring that they had always known about climate change but had been "misunderstood".  This is detailed extensively in Steve Coll's increasingly important book Private Empire (see chapter 15 "On my honor").  Between 2006 and 2008, the company began to mark its words on climate change more carefully and abruptly stopped funding multiple non-profit organizations and front groups it had been coordinating to apply pressure in the public policy arena by attacking climate science, climate scientists and elected officials who took up the charge.  This campaign ramped up after the 1997 Kyoto Protocol and escalated during the first 5 years of the Bush Administration. 


1. 1998 American Petroleum Institute Global Climate Science Communications Plan 

This leaked plan was launched the year after the Kyoto Protocol was signed. It was developed by representatives from the API, Exxon, Southern Company, Chevron and a team of people free market organizations along with communications professionals.  The plan includes a multimillion dollar, multi-year budget to install “uncertainty” in the public policy arena.  Target audiences are detailed including media, policy makers and science teachers and the plan includes an objectives list titled “Victory will be achieved…” itemizing the measurable goals of the plan. Multiple groups Exxon would subsequently fund are named in the plan. 





2. 1980 Imperial Oil’s Review of Environmental Protection Activities for 1978-1979

3. 1981 Letter from Esso scientist on impact of Natuna Gas Project CO2 emissions

February 3, 1981 letter from Gilbert Gervasi, scientist at Esso Eastern to G.A. Northington, Exxon Research and Engineering regarding CO2 calculations for the Natuna Gas Project finding “the total release of CO2 from producing Natuna gas and burning of LNG manufactured from the gas would be almost twice that emitted by burning the equivalent amount of coal.”

There are multiple other key documents on Natuna in the ClimateFiles archive.  The majority of these were illuminated by the Inside Climate News team

4. 1995 Global Climate Coalition draft primer Predicting Future Climate Change a Primer

This document contains a "final draft" of a to-be-published document by the Global Climate Coalition responding to the IPCC Second Assessment.  It has been edited by Lenny Bernstein a Mobil Oil scientist (page 2).  The document contains a back section with extensive rebuttals of major counter-arguments used by climate deniers. This part was never published.

5. 1996 Exxon publication "Global Warming - Who's Right?"

Exxon Corporation’s Spring 1996 Publication, “Global warming: who’s right? Facts about a debate that’s turned up more questions than answers,” includes a statement by then Exxon CEO Lee Raymond trumping up uncertainty in the science behind global warming as well as the cost of a carbon-restricted market. The publication cites to Exxon funded climate change deniers.

6. 1997 Lee Raymond speech at China World Petroleum Congress

In this speech, delivered in October 1997, weeks before the Kyoto Protocol final negotiations commenced, Raymond launches attacks on climate science and policy proposals.  He exclaims that proposed international climate change policies will adversely affect Asian countries desiring economic growth.

7. 1998 ExxonMobil Pamphlet: Global Climate Change - everyone’s debate

This pamphlet, circulated to both U.S. and international policy-makers questions whether climate change is man-made and if so, the extent of contribution of fossil fuels to the problem. Although statements in this pamphlet are partially true in that Exxon “carefully studied” the science behind climate change, it contradicts its own internal early climate change research and findings and instead emphasizes unknowns in the “honest debate.”

8. 2000 ExxonMobil publishes collection of New York Times Op-ad series on climate change

In April 2000, Exxon published a collection of Op Eds it had submitted across the country in order to influence public understanding of the risks of climate change and proposed solutions. The series here includes articles entitled “Do No Harm,” “Unsettled Science,” “The Promise of Technology,” and “The Path Forward on Climate Change.” Each of these propaganda pieces highlights uncertainty regarding impacts and paints Exxon as a key to the solution for global climate change rather than the problem. Readers can review highlighted excerpts and the rhetoric used in 2000 with Exxon political activity at the time. 

9. 2001 FOIA-ed memo from Exxon Mobil’s Randy Randol to Bush Administration

This fax and memorandum dated February 6, 2001 from Exxon lobbyist Randy Randol to John Howard at the White House Center for Environmental Quality makes recommendations for changing the U.S. team working on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Third Assessment and Synthesis Report and delaying IPCC proceedings.  

Another 2002 memo from Randy Randol to the Bush Whitehouse outlined what would eventually become the Bush program

10. 2006 ExxonMobil Heartland Institute DCI Group meeting targeting Clean Air Act

This meeting invitation and agenda illustrate the ongoing ringleader role ExxonMobil played in organizing asymmetrical attacks on the Clean Air Act and other environmental protections laws.  The meeting was hosted by Heartland Institute which received a $115,000 grant from ExxonMobil that year.  The meeting was held at the offices of DCI Group, a public relations firm contracted by ExxonMobil.



Do you like this post?

Showing 9 reactions

commented 2017-02-21 10:15:57 -0800 · Flag
AC Repair Services in Gurgaon

AC Repair Services Gurgaon

Refrigerator Repair Services in Gurgaon @

Washing Machine Repair Services in Gurgaon @

Geyser Repair Services in Gurgaon @

Kitchen Machine Repair Services in Gurgaon @

Microwave Repair Services in Gurgaon @

RO Repair Services in Gurgaon @
commented 2017-01-22 22:12:36 -0800 · Flag
<a href=“”">" title=“9apps”> 9apps </a>
<a href=“”">" title=“9apps download”> 9apps download </a>
commented 2017-01-07 03:28:49 -0800 · Flag
commented 2017-01-07 03:28:32 -0800 · Flag
commented 2017-01-07 03:28:06 -0800 · Flag
commented 2016-06-08 07:36:27 -0700 · Flag
Either Ryan is part of the solution or part of the problem.
commented 2016-05-29 13:37:39 -0700 · Flag
I am dumbfounded at the lies and blatently unethical conduct Exxon engaged in for decades re climate change caused by the use of fossil fuels. The colossal stupidity of their denial and the incredible amount of money spent on efforts to manipulate policy re climate change is stunning! What did these morons think was going to happen? The best they could have hoped for was that they could continue reaping profits for a few more years until people realized what they were doing, which was inevitable. So, because of the far-reaching consequences of the decision makers at Exxon, even more tens of thousands of people will lose their homes and property and possibly their lives due to the rising ocean levels, subsidence, and bad weather, more species of animals will become extinct than normally would have, more of our oceans’ coral reefs will die, many species of fish will also become extinct, and God knows what the other negative effects will occur.

When Exxon realized what the use of fossil fuels was doing to our climate, they could have become an ethical, moral world leader that wanted to help save all of us from the detrimental effects of global warming. But they didn’t care one whit about others. Instead they chose to throw tens of thousands of dollars at convincing people that global warming was not real so that they could continue business as usual.

Our government could have protected us from Exxon’s bad decisions to some extent. That is one of the functions of modern democratic governments. Instead, greedy money worshipers in our
legislature were happily corrupted by the oil and gas industry throwing money at them with the expectation of favored treatment for their industry. I can hardly wrap my brain around the worship of money and rampant greed in this country. It has corrupted everything. Particularly offensive is the fact that many, (ok most) of the people and businesses engaged in greedy behavior don’t see it for what it is. They actually think they are terribly clever and smarter than people who reject greed and live their lives accordingly. Ultimately, however, the joke will be on them when they realize that their obsession with money over everything else has resulted in changing all of our lives in very
negative ways. That is, if they are smart enough to realize it, which is debatable.